top of page
Search


1-7-2026 NC Court of Appeals Decision "In re: Russo": (1) No Contest Clauses are Still Impotent, and (2) Corporate Law Firms Cannot Be Fiduciaries, Only Individual Lawyers.
The North Carolina Court of Appeals issued a unanimous decision on January 7, 2026, in the case In re: Russo (opinion here ). This ruling focuses on two important issues in estate law: (1) the limited power of "in terrorum" or no contest clauses in wills, and (2) the legal distinction between individual lawyers and law firms serving as fiduciaries under North Carolina law. The first major point the court makes is that no contest clauses, also known as "in terrorum" clauses (
jason jones
3 minutes ago2 min read


Which Clock is Ticking? Recent (Unpublished) NC Court of Appeals' decision in October of 2025 continues precedent of applying the 3-year contract statute of limitations when suing to contest a POA.
Court Opinion: https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=44709 Facts: A POA is executed in 2016. Two years later in 2018 the named agent under the POA executes a deed through the purported powers of the 2016 POA. One year later in 2019, the principal of the POA dies. Three years later in 2022 a quiet title action is filed challenging the validity of the 2018 deed on the theory that the 2016 POA was ineffective due to allegations that the principal lacked capacity and
jason jones
Nov 20, 20252 min read


2023 In Review (All Appellate NC Trust & Estate Cases)
In 2023 there were approximately 14 appellate North Carolina cases (2 from our state Supreme Court) touching on fiduciary disputes. Cases...
jason jones
Aug 20, 20243 min read


2022 In Review (All NC Trust & Estate Cases)
In 2022 there were approximately 14 appellate cases in North Carolina that touched on trusts and estates: Barrington v. Dyer, 282 N.C....
jason jones
Feb 25, 20232 min read
bottom of page